Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere.

From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Sun Mar 28 2004 - 20:03:04 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD junk or politics on this list"

    I think we've about reached the end of our discussion of whether inorganic
    patterns can still respond to DQ or not. When we start talking about other
    universes, anything can be assumed. I've always presupposed that the MOQ
    was about our reality, not some reality in another cosmos where perhaps
    pigs can fly. So at this point I will bow out of our conversation with
    thanks to you for the opportunity to express my views on the subject. Let
    us hold on to our common understanding in the power of beauty to draw us
    to ever higher levels of quality. For me and I'm sure for you, it's the
    lure of the aesthetic continuum that keeps us constantly seeking greater
    understanding.

    With warm regards,
    Platt

    Hi Platt,
    As you wish.
    Your challenging arguments have made me question my fundamental view of the
    MoQ, and that is warmly welcomed. To challenge one's fundamental view point can
    be a fearful prospect? One must be prepared to face the possibility of
    experiencing that, 'rug pulled from underneath you' feeling? One must be honest and
    open to change?

    I am not sure if i am up to the task, but hope to try.
    I hope you understand that i cannot proceed now until the issue of
    simultaneous evolution is clarified? For upon this basis rests so much of my current
    thinking.

    All the best,
    Mark :-)

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 28 2004 - 20:04:57 BST