From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Thu Apr 15 2004 - 21:52:49 BST
Hi Mark
Sorry for any confusion, just wanted to clarify things particularly
for those who have not yet read your MOQ site fronting essay.
But also wanting to open debate and see how other people take
my particular version of things below. I do see you as playing an
important role in supporting the process theory nature of the MOQ.
Mark 15-4-04: Hi David M, Thank you. I like the way you put that, 'process
theory.' That nicely sums up the fluid nature of our experience? There are many
very persistent and static patterns in our experience, but even these are
fluid?
DM:
As I see it this site is all about exploring Pirsig's ideas, relating
them
to other people's ideas and helping people explore the extent and depth
of these ideas. I was reading Philosophy Now today, and some of
the stuff in that is just such confused SOM stuff, now that is sad.
Mark 15-4-04: I know! It's been a long time since i read a copy of PN, but it
can be quite tough going can't it?
Glad to see apology to Sam, I think we all do well to lay off the abuse
stuff.
We really all have a lot more in common that with either the man in the
street
or the student in the average university. Most people in an SOM
confusion have
long since given up any thought whatsoever.
regards
David M
Mark 15-4-04: I agree. It can be a sobering experience to see first hand what
goes on in University these days? The things they think are precious? I can't
understand!
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 15 2004 - 21:54:38 BST