Re: MD The Individual Level

From: Joe (jhmau@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Mon Apr 19 2004 - 22:42:13 BST

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD The Individual Level"

    On 18 April 2004 6:10 PM Mark writes:

    Mark:
    Dmb's feeling of evasive tactics on the part of Sam, and every other
    Christian he has ever had any dealings with resonates with my experience
    also. And over this past week i have felt it all over again. There are
    Theological University degrees, masters, PhD's going into tortuous
    detail regarding these issues. And if that isn't a concrete example of
    becoming more and more static, i am not sure what is?

    Hi Mark, DMB, David M, and all,

    joe: where do I find an example of a mystical connection in an intellectual
    pattern? In the mystical experience of today I have a mind and body. I
    have an intellect and will. I have myths. Quality inheres in the
    substance. With this mystical perception I argue for a Subject Object
    Metaphysics. There is no commonly accepted experience of the dynamic in
    intellectual patterns. It is not just Christians that go into tortuous
    detgails. Anyone who places his opinion above his existence becomes more
    static.

    The British Empire is not a myth! That a small island nation controlled
    such a large colonial empire and mounted a military expedition against Tibet
    is incredible (dynamic)? If I know a trick to pit people against each
    other, then I can come in and pick up the pieces. This is not dynamic! It
    is only a trick on how to control others until they learn the trick.

    Can Christianity survive the MOQ? In the last century East meeting West was
    a big deal. In England Peter Ouspensky (Russian), John Bennett, Rodney
    Collins, Maurice Nicoll and others followed the lead of George Gurdjieff
    (Russian) in France. They pondered esoteric Christianity and the Scientific
    evolution.

    Today in Medjugorje reportedly mystic visions are occurring. Why this
    tradition? In Christianity from the beginning the mystical was emphasized.
    The parable of the mustard seed which though seemingly small grows into a
    huge tree in which all the birds of the air find a roost. The parable that
    a little bit of yeast leavens the whole batch. The parable of the lillies
    of the field which neither toil nor spin.

    IMO Christianity does not neglect the mystical. Anthropomorphizing dq may
    embody the static which you hate. I don't know that this is just a
    Christian phenomenon. Something has hidden mystic dq since intellectual
    patterns have been used. I guess it is just I.

    Joe

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 19 2004 - 22:41:26 BST