RE: MD Coherence and MOQ levels. part 2

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sat Jun 12 2004 - 03:54:36 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD Coherence and MOQ levels. part 1"

    Mark said more than once:
     I feel my view ties things together neatly, elegantly and with great
    economy
    of explanation.
    dmb's refusal to engage with the ideas expressed in my initial post on this
    Topic, and then to avoid these issues further by misleading the Focus group

    is totally unacceptable in my view. I look forward to hearing from you dmb.
    Thank you.

    dmb replies:
    I guess we'll just have to disagree because I find your explanations to be
    almost entirely incoherent and honestly have no idea what you're trying to
    say. I don't even know what you mean by "coherence". So its not that I WILL
    NOT engage, it is that I CANNOT engage. I don't see how, for example, DQ and
    the event stream has anything to do with the static levels. The only way
    such an approach could possbily make any sense would be in an assertion of
    what the static levels ARE NOT.
     
    And the one of the main reasons that I believe you were not really even
    responding to my points is that you criticized one of Pirsig's metapors for
    being unPirsigian. You attacked the idea as if it were mine, even though the
    Pirsig quote that contained the metaphor was included in the post to which
    you were supposedly responding. This shows careless reading at best. In
    fact, you've siezed upon my least important point a little joke about Kate
    Beckinsale and left the main ideas untouched. And it hardly seems fair that
    I should have to read your unrelated essay while you apparently won't even
    take the time to properly read what I post on the elected topic.
     
    If there is some reason you wish me to understand your ideas about
    "coherence", then you'll have to give me something more than a homework
    assignment.
     
    Honestly. I really don't know what you're talking about. I mean, I don't
    even know what the topic is. That's the level of incoherence I find in your
    posts. Is there even a Lila quote that uses the word as you mean it?
     
    Good luck,
    dmb
     
     

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 12 2004 - 03:59:08 BST