Re: MD Notes on Beauty, Art and DQ

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Wed Jun 16 2004 - 13:20:02 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD facts and harmony"

    Hi All,

    More notes on Beauty, Art and DQ

    --Schopenhauer is one of my favorite philosophers. I like him because, to
    quote Will Durant , "He saw that the ultimate good is beauty, and that
    ultimate joy lies in creating and cherishing the beautiful."

    --Is there "progress" in art?. No. There has never been, nor possibly
    ever be, a more profound depiction of animals than on the caves of
    Lascaux. Beauty doesn't improve with time.

    --Making music for cultural impact is simply money grubbing or political
    propaganda. Making music to reflect the goodness of ultimate beauty has
    always been every artist's challenge, today more than ever. What passes
    for music in today's "culture" was best described by Al Capp: "A product
    of the untalented sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered."
    Case in point: the Superbowl half time show.

    --There is a form of understanding beyond the scientifically intellectual,
    the Mu understanding, thinking without thought, the aesthetic experience
    of Dynamic Quality, beyond words but real.

    --I have felt the "lightness" of DQ infrequently but certainly something I
    don't quickly forget. One instance occurred to me while standing in front
    of a small painting by Monet at the San Francisco museum. In fact, now
    that I think about it, most of my "transformations" have been brought
    about when experiencing art of one kind or another-- painting, sculpture,
    music, literature. A recent example is now in the forum, a short story by
    John Galsworthy simply entitled, "Quality." As I read the final lines, I
    felt a sudden connection with the beauty of immediate reality so strong
    that it brought tears to my eyes.

    --There's an MOQ attitude that's different from SOM, an attitude of "Push
    on until you capture the beauty of the thing, because if it isn't
    beautiful, you really haven't got it yet." Great scientists, dedicated
    SOMers all, have this attitude. They understand its importance. They may
    even realize that without this element of quality, their endeavors within
    the SOM structure and the structure itself may ultimately fail.

    --Just when I think I have it all intellectually figured out, I'm realize
    fooling myself. There will always be a gaping hole in our efforts to
    explain reality if for no other reason than we cannot stand outside of it
    to see all of it. Our models omit the mind that creates the model. If that
    isn't enough to give pause to those who think they can explain what makes
    the world go around, they should remember that at the bottom of physics
    one disappears into the hole of the Uncertainty Principle, and at the
    bottom of math and logic an even larger bottomless crevice called the
    Incompleteness Theorem stands ready to swallow all who claim to have the
    answers. Any philosophy or worldview can be shredded by both intellectual
    and emotional attacks, usually combined for added force. Even "objective"
    science is under fire by the guns of the postmodernists who claim as a
    fact that there are no facts. The more I try to get it all down pat, the
    more I realize the effort is a chimera. Except for one thing. Beauty. It
    was beauty that began my quest for answers years ago, and it is still
    beauty that sustains me through the swirling darkness of doubt. When words
    fail, beauty begins. It renders explanation and understanding besides the
    point. Beauty (and its companion, art) originally attracted me to Pirsig's
    Metaphysic of Quality, for I associate quality with beauty. The error and
    folly lies in the attempt to verbalize what can't be. Pirsig admits as
    much. Writing philosophy-then arguing about it is degenerate. Ah, but
    being human, we do it anyway. To borrow a phrase, the only person who
    doesn't pollute the beauty of the world with intellect is a person who
    hasn't yet been born. The rest of us have to settle for being something
    less pure.

    Best,
    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 16 2004 - 13:44:14 BST