Re: MD Neo-Nazi Racism and the MOQ go together like peanutbutter and bro ken glass. Sandwich anyone?

From: Paul Vogel (nitzke@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Jun 22 2004 - 17:17:48 BST

  • Next message: Paul Vogel: "Re: MD COSMOTHEISM"

    Hello All,

    As is obvious from the "title" of this thread:

    "MD Neo-Nazi Racism and the MOQ go together like peanutbutter and bro ken
    glass. Sandwich anyone?"

    This is an obvious attempt to slander my religion of COSMOTHEISM or
    CLASSICAL PANTHEISM by falsely calling my religious beliefs "Neo-Nazi
    Racism", which is just a ad hominem personal attack, although it was sneaky
    and "in-direct", it remains one nevertheless.

    However, as Platt says below, and then quotes Pirsig, the MOQ considers all
    such ad hominem personal attacks as being EVIL:

    But I take comfort in the knowledge that when one finds it necessary to
    resort to name calling, Pirsig sets him straight:

    "To say that a comment is "stupid" is to imply that the person who makes it
    is stupid. This is the "ad hominem" argument: meaning, "to the person."
    Logically it is irrelevant. If Joe says the sun is shining and you argue
    that Joe is insane, or Joe is a Nazi or Joe is stupid, what does this tell
    us about the condition of the sun? That the ad hominem argument is
    irrelevant is usually all the logic texts say about it, but the MOQ allows
    one to go deeper and make what may be an original contribution. It says the
    ad hominem argument is a form of evil. The MOQ divides the hominem, or
    "individual" into four parts: inorganic, biological, and intellectual. Once
    this analysis is made, the ad hominem argument can be defined more clearly:
    It is an attempt destroy the intellectual patterns of an individual by
    attacking his social status. In other words, a lower form of evolution is
    being used to destroy a higher form. That is evil." (Lila's Child, note 140)

    Case closed.

    Best, Platt

    >From: "Platt Holden" <pholden@sc.rr.com>
    >Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >To: moq_discuss@moq.org, owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
    >Subject: Re: MD Neo-Nazi Racism and the MOQ go together like peanutbutter
    >and bro ken glass. Sandwich anyone?
    >Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:01:38 -0400
    >
    >Hi All,
    >
    > > On 21 Jun 2004 at 10:35, Platt Holden wrote:
    > >
    > > Pirsig:
    > > "What makes the free-enterprise system superior is that the
    > > socialists, reasoning intelligently and objectively, have
    > > inadvertently closed the door to Dynamic Quality in the buying and
    > > selling of things. They closed it because the metaphysical structure
    > > of their objectivity never told them Dynamic Quality exists." (Lila,
    > > 17)
    > >
    > > Platt:
    > > To all egalitarians, communitarians and other radical left-wingers
    > > who think the MOQ supports their collectivist social values--read it
    > > again and weep. Intellect sides with free enterprise.
    > >
    > > msh says:
    > > What Platt doesn't understand is that Pirsig is speaking about a
    > > theoretical "Free Market" that doesn't exist.
    >
    >Nonsense. Pirsig writes:
    >
    >"People, like everything else, work better in parallel than they do in
    >series, and that is what happens in THIS FREE ENTERPRISE CITY. When things
    >are organized socialistically in a bureaucratic series, any increase in
    >complexity increases the probability of failure. But when they're
    >organized in a free-enterprise parallel, an increase in complexity becomes
    >an increase in diversity more capable of responding to Dynamic Quality,
    >and thus an increase of the probability of success. It's this diversity
    >and parallelism that make this city work. And not just this city. Our
    >greatest national economic success, agriculture, is organized almost
    >entirely in parallel." (Lila, 17) (emphasis added)
    >
    >By "this free enterprise city" Pirsig is speaking about the existing New
    >York, not some theoretical Utopia.
    >
    >Wouldn't you think that in a site dedicated to Pirsig that contributors
    >would actually read what he wrote once in awhile?
    >
    >Best,
    >Platt
    >
    >
    >
    >MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >Mail Archives:
    >Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    >To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    _________________________________________________________________
    FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now!
    http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 22 2004 - 18:54:45 BST