RE: MD Pirsig the Critic

From: johnny moral (johnnymoral@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jul 01 2004 - 15:34:50 BST

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "MD Catholic/Protestant"

    Hi Rick, welcome back.

    It's ironic that you post an anti-miscegenation rant with your first post!
    I thought we were through with these cut and paste jobs!

    Johnny

    >From: "Valence" <valence10@hotmail.com>
    >Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    >Subject: MD Pirsig the Critic
    >Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:45:30 -0400
    >
    >Hi all,
    >My recent withdrawal from the MD notwithstanding, I just had to share this
    >one with the friends I know I still have here :-)
    >
    >Anyway, following up on a lead I found at Ian Glendinning's wonderful
    >Psybertron website (http://www.psybertron.org/pirsigpages.html), I shuffled
    >down to the basement of the New York Public Library and eventually was able
    >to locate this "long lost" Pirsig article. It's a book review he wrote for
    >the The New York Times Sunday Book Review which was published on June 8,
    >1975. I had to retype the whole thing from a blurry print-out of a
    >microfilm archive. Words that (I think) were in italics are herein
    >rendered
    >with asterisks.
    >
    >It's my gift to you.
    >
    >Enjoy...
    >
    >and take care
    >rick
    >--------------------------------------------------
    >A husband without a wife
    >
    >ONE MAN, HURT
    >
    >A Shattering Account of the End of a Happy Marriage. By Albert Martin. 278
    >pp. New York: Macmillan. $8.95
    >
    >By Robert Pirsig (Robert Pirsig, author of "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle
    >Maintenance," is now a Guggenheim Fellow writing a second book.)
    >
    >"One Man, Hurt" describes in detail the agonizing chronology of a divorce,
    >shows the life that preceded and surrounds it, and calls for opposition
    >to the social trends the author feels produced it. As a document of marital
    >bliss and as an attack on feminism it backfires completely. The author's
    >atrocious suburban banality drowns out everything else.
    > We never get done reading how much the author loves his wife, his
    >children,
    >washing dishes, doing diapers, his house (a suburban one in Connecticut),
    >his neighborhood, his job, his church, his priest, his mother and father,
    >his mother-in-law, his father-in-law, the Little League, kid's hockey, TV,
    >their cats and dogs. For him suburban life is some sort of continuous
    >ceremony, a ritual he must have learned to imitate watching old Andy Hardy
    >shows on the late-late movie on TV. Then, when his wife tells him she
    >wants
    >a divorce to "discover herself," he cries *what* is she *talking* about?
    >What more can he possibly *give* her? Throughout the book, he never finds
    >out.
    >
    >However, if one can transcend this banal level, one can find in this book
    >some unexpected literary merit. The author tells us how miserable he is,
    >yet because he doesn't know how to render it properly we never see it for
    >ourselves. But he really is miserable. As one reads on, one begins to see
    >beneath the surface of his plastic suburban style and acquire tolerance and
    >even sympathy for his predicament. His one saving grace begins to shine
    >through: he is not an arrogant man. He sincerely tries to learn what is
    >wrong, tries to change himself. He really *is* hurt, and he hasn't
    >deliberately hurt anyone else to provoke it. What are the real causes?
    >What could he have done? he asks. What can he do now? It would be an act
    >of arrogance not to try to answer.
    >
    >The first key is his pathetic clinging to the material symbols of
    >middle-class life. This, one discovers, is a poor boy, ambitious and
    >undoubtedly hard-working, from a Polish Roman Catholic childhood in New
    >England. Everything he loves, down to his cats and dogs, are symbols of
    >his
    >upward rise from the background of his immigrant parents. Now, like Jay
    >Gatsby and Sammy Glick before him, he sees it all turning to ashes. The
    >central shining symbol of his own aspirations, the ballet dancer on the New
    >York stage whom he persuaded to marry him, wants out. She sees her whole
    >life is just a cheap symbol, like everything else in his world and she
    >wants
    >something more real.
    >
    >She asks him to look inward, but he doesn't know what she is talking about.
    >For them there is no inward self, only roles. He is a totally
    >other-directed man, a result of a background he cannot change and cannot
    >even understand. At the superficial level of his own understanding there
    >is
    >no difference between his New England Catholicism and his wife's Texas
    >Methodism, but at a level he is unaware of there are very deep differences,
    >and these, I think, are the root of it all.
    >
    >I once taught a college course where I asked the class, "Is the an absolute
    >external morality?" And I was astonished to discover that, without
    >exception, every Catholic student said yes, and every Protestant student
    >said no. There is a profound division here.
    >
    >For the traditional Catholic layman, morality is external. The author
    >remembers vividly the terror he felt in parochial school when he saw what
    >happened to Cecelia after she defied Sister Anastasia. He still feels it.
    >For him the other-directed authoritarian system of his moral education has
    >become the pattern of his life, and we see in page after page his professed
    >love of, and obedience to, authority. He is a system player. That is how
    >he had to learn it. You love the system and the system loves you. Now the
    >system is failing and he is without a clue and in terror as to why this
    >should happen.
    >
    >Protestants, including his own wife, tend to take more heed of their own
    >consciences when coming to moral decisions. This is more true among
    >Methodists than many other sects, more true of all, I think, among
    >Protestants residing in the state of Texas. In fact, if there's one thing
    >the traditional Texas Protestant knows how to do better than anything else,
    >it's how to make up his *own* ornery mind about what is right and what is
    >wrong, and *keeps* it made up, come hell or high water, or anything else
    >you
    >might want to run in front of him. Texas girls see this in their fathers
    >and grow up unconsciously expecting to find it in every man. This,
    >tragically, in the one thing the author cannot supply. He must run to
    >authorities for every moral decision and every major idea in his head. And
    >by Texas Protestant standards this makes him a moral weakling and a
    >failure,
    >and this, I think, is why his wife cannot love him. And there is nothing
    >he
    >can do about it.
    >
    >Nevertheless, I think this book will provide a happy ending for its author.
    >It is, among other things, a 278-page marital advertisement which should
    >produce dozens, if not hundreds, of matrimonial offers. I hope, for his
    >own
    >sake, that his final choice is someone who really appreciates him for the
    >good man he is. Preferably, it should be an Eastern, Polish, Roman
    >Catholic
    >woman, heavy-boned and big-breasted, domineering and authoritarian, from a
    >childhood of poverty like the one he got away from by marrying the little
    >ballet dancer from Texas. She should love him earthily, and also her
    >children and her church discipline and the suburban life, because she finds
    >in these things the meaning of life itself. He deserves it.
    >
    >As for his divorced wife, I don't know what will happen. She has a hard
    >life coming.
    >
    >But there's a feeling, rising up from deep inner sources, that in the end,
    >when it is all over for all of us, it will be she who goes to heaven long
    >before he does.
    >
    >
    >MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    >Mail Archives:
    >Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    >Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    >MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    >To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    >http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    _________________________________________________________________
    Make the most of your family vacation with tips from the MSN Family Travel
    Guide! http://dollar.msn.com

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 01 2004 - 15:40:04 BST