RE: MD (no subject)

From: johnny moral (johnnymoral@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 07 2004 - 17:51:15 BST

  • Next message: ml: "Re: MD Enriched by Quality"

    Hi Matt & Calvin,

    >Often two people can experience a bond so close, as to feel like one
    >person, achieved through sex (physically), and through the mind. Is not
    >the mind the most sensitive erogenous zone?

    Yes, this is the moral goal. Two people having sex are supposed to believe
    they have become one flesh, from now on, inseperably married. It is a
    terrible modern belief, which porn both contributes to and is a product of,
    that people stay individuals for their whole lives, even after a solomnized
    marriage, let alone after having sex. This belief prevents people from ever
    becoming fully human and complete in a marriage, even when they marry and
    feel they have everything.

    This is how sex, which obviously requires two people (two sexes, in fact)
    remains biological. Sex is not two biological units interacting (which
    would make it a social pattern), it is one fully human unit behaving
    biologically. This is a moral belief that must be believed in order for it
    to be true, like all things, obviously. (Homosexual interactions, I feel I
    must be clear, are intellectually motivated social interactions, not
    biological, as the two partners do not join biologically into one.)

    As to porn, it also is an intellectual pattern. I feel it is about society
    more than it is social. It comes about when social patterns of individuals
    talking about biological sex are applied anonymously and universally with
    the goal of changing society into another society, it is the interaction of
    a society that thinks of sex as occuring on the biological level with a new
    one that thinks of people as individuals and sex as being social
    interaction, and porn is an intellectually conceived tool to achieve this.

    Johnny

    >>From: MBSJ79@aol.com
    >>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >>To: moq_discuss@moq.org
    >>Subject: MD (no subject)
    >>Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 10:35:17 EDT
    >>
    >>To all:
    >>
    >> What are your views (if any) on pornography? The industry, the
    >>concept,
    >>the media, et cetera. Where does it fall in the MoQ? What kind of Quality
    >>(or
    >>lack of) does it possess? From my limited experience I'd equate it to that
    >>of
    >>food, in a sense. Before a big meal, especially when you're hungry, you
    >>need
    >>it. Then after you're done with it, it's lost it's luster. It's almost
    >>disgusting.
    >>
    >>calvin.

    _________________________________________________________________
    MSN Life Events gives you the tips and tools to handle the turning points in
    your life. http://lifeevents.msn.com

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 07 2004 - 18:04:01 BST