From: Paul Turner (paul@turnerbc.co.uk)
Date: Wed Jul 14 2004 - 09:38:43 BST
Hi David
David M said:
But would
> you say that anything is fundamental to
> the MOQ?
Paul:
What I meant by "fundamental" here was: that which everything is
composed of, or in terms of a philosophy, that which everything must be
described by.
In a SOM everything is composed of mind or matter, and accordingly
everything must be described in terms of a subject and objects.
In the MOQ, everything is composed of value, and accordingly everything
must be described in terms of value.
The distinction I made is that anything that is *a pattern of* value is
real, but it is value itself that is fundamental. Subjects and objects
are described as patterns of value. Hence, subjects and objects are real
but not fundamental.
David M said:
In a way Quality, DQ/SQ
> is I guess, but this is only one possible
> cut of reality I guess, it has a certain
> advantage over the subject-object cut,
> but there could be other useful cuts, say
> between current experience and remembered
> experience -which would tell us certain things about
> experience but not as much as SQ/DQ.
> Would you agree with this?
Paul:
There are certainly different ways of dividing reality. I think "current
and remembered" comes close to Dynamic and static, actually.
Cheers
Paul
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jul 17 2004 - 02:05:47 BST