From: Arlo Bensinger (ajb102@psu.edu)
Date: Tue Jul 20 2004 - 17:21:38 BST
Hi Mark,
You wrote:
It may be argued that each person, as Arlo suggests, will value a coherent
state dominated by particular level(s) depending on the fluctuations of
season, desire, social expectation and intellectual value. Dan wishes to
morally bias the Intellectually dominated - fair but impractical - in the
real world many people value biological and social patterns over
intellectual patterns.
Arlo asks:
Sorry for the delay in getting back to this thread. Would it be fair to say
that so long as biological and social valued activities do not threaten the
levels above them, that the MOQ would not criticize their practice?
"Freedom" would then be the ability to participate in biologically,
socially and/or intellectually valued patterns that do not threaten the
layers above them.
I wish I could use the term coherence, but I must admit I don't fully
understand it.
Arlo
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 21 2004 - 05:34:33 BST