Re: MD MOQ and Logic/Science

From: ml (mbtlehn@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Thu Sep 02 2004 - 05:50:14 BST

  • Next message: Wim Nusselder: "Re: MD the quality of equality"

    Hello Scott,

    Tell me more.

    I am afraid that I do not see how an independent
    notion of time (apart from relative movement) is required.
    If it is I need to understand it.

    thanks--mel

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Scott Roberts" <jse885@earthlink.net>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 5:58 PM
    Subject: Re: MD MOQ and Logic/Science

    > Mel,
    >
    > Interesting, but it doesn't address the issue which mainly concerns me,
    > which is that most of the operations you lay out here require something
    > unthinkable, namely the interplay between the eternal and the temporal.
    For
    > example, one needs to be eternal to actually use something that has been
    > stored, or to detect a difference between anything. Abstraction requires
    > eternity, as does reflection, and so forth.
    >
    > - Scott
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 02 2004 - 05:55:56 BST