From: Steve Peterson (speterson@fast.net)
Date: Mon Jan 20 2003 - 19:02:42 GMT
Platt,
> PIRSIG:
> Both "the genius" and the mentally retarded person are at the social
> level.
>
> GLOVER:
> Could you elaborate on what you mean by being "at the social level"?
>
> PIRSIG:
> My statement that "Both 'the genius' and the mentally retarded person
> are at the social level." is intended to refute the statement that "the
> genius appears to be on a higher evolutionary level" A person who holds
> an idea is a social entity, no matter what ideas he holds. The ideas he
> holds are an intellectual entity, no matter who holds them.
>
> That quashes DMB's theory that, "The whole point of making
> distinctions between levels of static patterns is to demonstrate that
> people are NOT at the same levels."
>
> Actually, the difference between the social and intellectual levels is the
> difference between outer groupthink (what everybody says) and inner
> mindthink (what I say), both considered "subjective" in SOM and thus a
> constant source of moral confusion.
Steve:
It's nice to know that Pirsig considers all people to be social entities,
but it would be much more helpful to understand how he distinguishes a
biological entity from a social entity and a social entity from an
intellectual entity in general.
Also, what do you think of Wim's formulation?
Steve
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 20 2003 - 19:04:45 GMT