Re: MD The historical context of Pragmatism

From: Elizaphanian (Elizaphanian@members.v21.co.uk)
Date: Wed Jan 22 2003 - 04:45:05 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD DQ people"

    This didn't seem to get through the first time.

    > Hi people,
    >
    > Had to give my two cents on this (well, two thoughts.)
    >
    > 1. On Wittgenstein and the logical positivists: Ray Monk (the biographer
    of
    > W) tells the wonderful story of how when he was invited to speak to the
    > Vienna Circle, Wittgenstein would sometimes "turn his back on them and
    read
    > poetry. In particular - as if to emphasise to them... that what he had not
    > said in the Tractatus was more important that what he had - he read them
    the
    > poems of Rabindranath Tagore... whose poems express a mystical outloook
    > diametrically opposed to that of the members of [the] circle.... To the
    > positivists, clarity went hand in hand with the scientific method, and, to
    > Carnap in particular, it was a shock to realise that the author of the
    book
    > they regarded as the very paradigm of philosophical precision and clarity
    > was so determinedly unscientific in both temperament and method." I love
    > the image of a bunch of positivists gathered at the feet of the master,
    who
    > turns his back on them and forces them to listen to poetry. Of course, if
    > Struan is right about the positivists, that anecdote has no point :o)
    >
    > 2. On Wittgenstein and pragmatism: a new book has just been published by
    > Russell Goodman on Wittgenstein and William James; I haven't got it -
    yet -
    > but the first chapter, on W and the pragmatists (showing how W was NOT a
    > pragmatist, although he accepts that he is arguing something that 'sounds
    > like' pragmatism) is available on-line at
    > http://assets.cambridge.org/0521813158/sample/0521813158WS.pdf
    >
    > Goodman is arguing that James had a big influence on Wittgenstein - which
    is
    > assuredly true, and not commonly enough understood - but if he goes
    further
    > (by saying that W actually *was* a pragmatist) I think he is on dodgy
    > ground. As - despite my usual agreement with him - I think Matt was when
    he
    > said (and I don't understand the grammar here): "the later Wittgenstein is
    > his turn towards pragmatism."
    >
    > Sam
    >
    > "We are actually leaving the world a better place than when we got it and
    > this is the really fantastic point about the real state of the world: that
    > mankind's lot has vastly improved in every significant measurable field
    and
    > that it is likely to continue to do so."
    > (Bjorn Lomborg)

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 22 2003 - 04:39:48 GMT