Re: MD Empiricism

From: MarshaV (marshalz@i-2000.com)
Date: Sun Nov 21 2004 - 20:56:15 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "RE: MD Empiricism"

    Hello Chin,

    I do not see a separation between the church and Christianity, even if
    there is a variety of practices. You tell me, what makes a person a
    Christian? Who teaches Christian beliefs? How long would Christianity,
    as a system of belief, survive without the church? What are the core
    Christian beliefs? What are the common Christian beliefs? (I would ask
    the same of Judaism and Islam.) It appears to me that Christianity is its
    people, and Christians have been taught what to believe by the Church.

    Am I missing something?

    It's time to empty the teacup.

    With respect,

    MarshaV

    At 02:05 PM 11/21/2004 -0500, you wrote:
    >In this, we are speaking of interpretations, or misinterpretations, as
    >opposed to Christianity. Right?
    >
    >Keep in context that Christianity has within it many sub-sectors, which
    >any, and even all can be wrong, but is it Christianity that is wrong, or
    >our use of Christianity, or "The Word" to prove our own biased realities?
    >Would it not be the same with the Buddhists? Do the cultures not take out
    >of it what they want, as opposed to what Buddha actually said?
    >
    >This is why I ask if there was a difference between mysticism and
    >spirituality. Does the church represent spirituality or culture? Is it the
    >church or Christianity that creates this opening for "impotency,
    >masturbation, degeneracy and VIOLENCE"?
    >
    >Please also keep in mind that I am not arguing for Christianity or
    >religion over mysticism or science. An intolerance for science or
    >mysticism would be no different from an intolerance for religion.
    >Religious intolerance of different religions would be so as well. God is
    >too big for any one religion. It is God, or the Source that we seek, and
    >where the traditional Christianity that you are speaking of goes wrong is
    >trying to put a face on God; to describe God, or even the need to describe
    >God.
    >
    >This in itself is not even the worst crimes against Christianity or
    >spirituality by the church.
    >
    >Wouldn't you think?
    >
    >Chin

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 21 2004 - 22:21:09 GMT