RE: MD People and Value in the MOQ

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Mon Nov 22 2004 - 00:06:45 GMT

  • Next message: David Morey: "Re: MD Empiricism"

    Simon said to Sam:
    > I think you would have to postulate a metaphysics of soul, or spirit, or
    > something, to get what you want. A metaphysics in which the individual
    human
    > is the most important and central thing in the universe simply by being an
    > individual human.

    Sam replied:
    ...you'll discover an essay I wrote about two years ago ('the eudaimonic
    MoQ' ) which expands the background to my concerns. You could indeed call it
    a 'metaphysics of soul',...

    dmb says:
    I find it very strange that I am just now learning about Sam's 'soul'. I
    mean, its obviously central to your questions about people in the MOQ, but
    its hardly even been mentioned. In fact, as far as I recall, its never been
    mentioned in this forum or in any of my private exchanges with Sam.

    I'm beginning to think it is a habit of the English to say everything EXCEPT
    what they actually mean.

    Or maybe Sam is intentionally stealthy about all such "theological"
    assertions. Again, it doesn't seem very honest or respectful.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 22 2004 - 00:45:36 GMT