Re: MD Our Immoral Supreme Court

From: hampday@earthlink.net
Date: Fri Jul 01 2005 - 17:39:16 BST

  • Next message: Mark Steven Heyman: "Re: MD Our Immoral Supreme Court"
  • Next message: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD MOQ in time and space"

    Hi Mark --

    > How can a selfless person own anything?

    How can one be a "selfless person"? Are you a selfless person? Do you know
    anyone who is?

    Selfness is the existential essence of a person. Biologically,
    sociologically and culturally, selfness defines the individual. Survival in
    life depends upon it. So does freedom of choice. A person without selfness
    has no reason to live; he or she is an automaton without value or purpose.

    The problem you seem to be struggling with is the notion of proprietary
    ownership. We do not "possess" things in the metaphysical sense that they
    are a part of us, any more than we "possess" God or reality or Quality. We
    are only observers of a world in which everything is an "other" to us. Our
    material possessions are no more than appropriated articles that can be
    transferred to other individuals at the end of our life-experience. They
    are consigned to us by virtue of our labor, payment, or inheritance.

    There is no greed implied in such transactions. All that is required is the
    willingness to work for what we have. Material goods earned for
    contributions to society are a measure of our individual freedom.
    Capitalism is not based on greed; it's the enlightenend concept of being
    rewarded commensurate with our productivity and talent.

    To assert that the individual has no "right" to material possessions because
    they are properties of some external "authority" is nonsensical. So is the
    idea of "selflessness". "Each according to his ability, to each according
    to his need"? Anyone who falls for that Marxist line doesn't know the value
    of human life. That's pure Collectivism, and it's where Chomsky and his
    fellow nihilists would dearly like to take us. I sincerely hope that no one
    here is reading that ideology into the MoQ.

    Essentially,
    Ham

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jul 01 2005 - 17:46:32 BST