From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Nov 25 2005 - 12:41:12 GMT
Arlo:
> [Platt]
> the 4th level should rightly be called the "Individual Level," for
> without the innovation of individuals, it wouldn't exist.
>
> [Arlo]
> Why not rename the social level the "individual level", since without
> "individuals holding hammers", cities wouldn't get built. Or, why not
> rename the biological level the "individual level", since without
> "individual bodies" the biological level wouldn't exist?
Show me "innovation" in a bunch of people holding hammers or in a gaggle
of geese.
> You continue to miss what is quite obvious. The "individual" and the
> "collective" are dialectically and intrinsically related at all levels on
> the MOQ. This is why Pirsig doesn't spotlight the "individual" as do the
> Randian Charlatans.
He spends a whole chapter putting the spotlight on the Randian brujo of
the Zuni, and a whole book on the individual "Lila."
Platt
.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 25 2005 - 12:42:18 GMT