MD The use of the MoQ

• Previous message: Valence: "Re: MD Changes"
• In reply to: Matt the Enraged Endorphin: "Re: MD Squonk wrote a Review"
• Next in thread: jhmau: "Re: MD Squonk wrote a Review"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In amongst Squonk's tirades of abuse, hilariously
justified retrospectively as 'satire' (in fact, this
is the only funny thing he has said), I noticed a
theme that seems quite interesting. It is exemplified
by his rhetoric of looking out into the woods and
appreciating quality. So, my question is, to what
extent is the MoQ an explanatory intellectual regime,
and to what extent is it normative? I've always
thought the former, in that it simply explains
reality, it explains the 'platypi etc. But Squonk
cites it as something that could perhaps 'produce'
quality, or at least make us appreciate quality. I've
always thought of the MoQ as an 'external' view of
experience, not something that 'prescribes'
qualitative relations 'internally'. Any thoughts?

Matt

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

• Next message: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD Systematic about the Sophists (Kingsley)"
• Previous message: Valence: "Re: MD Changes"
• In reply to: Matt the Enraged Endorphin: "Re: MD Squonk wrote a Review"
• Next in thread: jhmau: "Re: MD Squonk wrote a Review"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:18:28 GMT