From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Thu Apr 24 2003 - 21:23:58 BST
All,
In a recent post I said:
"Rather than use the distinction of subjects and objects as the primary
division that enables understanding of reality, Pirsig's second major
insight was to divide reality into a creative aspect (dynamic quality) and a
self-sustaining aspect (static quality). In ZAMM he explained how the
Quality event produces subjects and objects. In Lila, he explained that it
is more useful to think of the Quality Event as Dynamic Quality leaving
static patterns of value in its wake which can latch or not onto other
static patterns of value."
Is this a good interpretation of how the Quality Event would be redefined in
Lila?
How is ZAMM's Quality event and Quality=Experience reconciled with Lila's
static/dynamic split?
Thanks,
Steve
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 26 2003 - 15:44:50 BST