From: nic nott (gnicgnostic@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Wed May 28 2003 - 13:08:41 BST
As I understand it quality is being placed as a fundamental or the fundamental basis of perception . The definition of this quality being provided in the story of the essay . This definition seems profoundly tied up with human concious constructions only . For instance I can read a book or watch a film and I mentally grade them with levels of quality . On the other hand if Iook at a tree or a seascape the quality is always absolute , the sea is always perfect sea and trees are always perfect trees . More accurately to natural things quality does not apply , they are perfectly what they are and could not be anything else .
My question then is does this quality only apply to the perception of conciously constructed things ? I feel that quality is only reduced through the filters of perception , the perfectly enlightened being would see the perfection in any essay and equally always write the perfect essay . Quality is always perfect and so does not really exist .
I welcome any enlightenment in this matter.
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 28 2003 - 13:09:33 BST