Re: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ

From: Paul Turner (pauljturner@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Mon Jun 02 2003 - 14:42:06 BST

Next message: Steve Peterson: "Re: Re: MD MOQ human development and the levels"

Previous message: Paul Turner: "RE: MD MOQ human development and the levels"
In reply to: Paul Turner: "Re: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ"
Next in thread: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Sam

Just noticed a typo, corrected in bold:

The self referred to by dharma is 'big self' or
'universal mind', you're right, 'big self' cannot be
contained in symbols, but neither can IT BE CONTAINED
IN any individual,
society, religion, perception, emotion or static
pattern of any kind.

Funny how four words can change the meaning of a
sentence to such a degree!

cheers

Paul

__________________________________________________
Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/yplus/yoffer.html

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Steve Peterson: "Re: Re: MD MOQ human development and the levels"
Previous message: Paul Turner: "RE: MD MOQ human development and the levels"
In reply to: Paul Turner: "Re: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ"
Next in thread: Elizaphanian: "Re: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 14:42:30 BST