Re: Re: MD MOQ human development and the levels

• Previous message: Paul Turner: "Re: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ"
• Maybe in reply to: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD MOQ human development and the levels"
• Next in thread: David Buchanan: "RE: MD MOQ human development and the levels"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Squonk,

> Wilber is so tortuously convoluted, no one really understands what the blazes
> he's on about.

DMB could probably help explain it to you if you ask him nicely (i.e. no name
calling).

>Wilber is a Value sink
> in my view.

..and a cancer? Can you explain? What is so bad about Wilber other than that
you don't understand him?

You seem to be frustrated that everyone is philosophizing on this list. Isn't
that what it's here for? If it's not what you are here for then is it actually
you that really wants to end the discussion?

Your message seems to be "stop posting to this list and look at some art." Am
I wrong?

What do you get out of participating in this discussion group?

Thanks,
Steve

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

• Next message: Steve Peterson: "Re: RE: MD MOQ human development and the levels"
• Previous message: Paul Turner: "Re: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ"
• Maybe in reply to: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD MOQ human development and the levels"
• Next in thread: David Buchanan: "RE: MD MOQ human development and the levels"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:17:11 BST