Re: MD MOQ human development and the levels

From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Sun Jun 08 2003 - 22:46:16 BST

Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ"

Previous message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD DQ/SQ tension in government"
Maybe in reply to: Steve Peterson: "MD MOQ human development and the levels"
Next in thread: johnny moral: "Re: MD MOQ human development and the levels"
Maybe reply: Steve Peterson: "Re: Re: MD MOQ human development and the levels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Matt:
Wasn't it Pirsig himself who said that everything is an analogy?

Ah, here it is:

"Of course it's an analogy. Everything is an analogy. But the dialecticians
don't know that." (Ch. 30, ZMM)

sq: Oh dear. Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.
You see, some analogies - are better - than others. ;)
Dynamic Quality isn't an analogy. DQ is where the best analogies come from.

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ"
Previous message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD DQ/SQ tension in government"
Maybe in reply to: Steve Peterson: "MD MOQ human development and the levels"
Next in thread: johnny moral: "Re: MD MOQ human development and the levels"
Maybe reply: Steve Peterson: "Re: Re: MD MOQ human development and the levels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 08 2003 - 22:46:43 BST