Re: MD MOQ human development and the levels

From: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT (mpkundert@students.wisc.edu)
Date: Tue Jun 10 2003 - 18:36:51 BST

  • Next message: Scott R: "Re: MD The Eudaimonic MoQ"

    Matt:
    Wasn't it Pirsig himself who said that everything is an analogy?

    Ah, here it is:

    "Of course it's an analogy. Everything is an analogy. But the dialecticians don't know that." (Ch. 30, ZMM)

    Squonk:
    Oh dear. Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.
    You see, some analogies - are better - than others. ;)
    Dynamic Quality isn't an analogy. DQ is where the best analogies come from.
     
    Matt:
    Of course some analogies are better than others, when have I ever said that they weren't?

    But, by saying that DQ isn't an analogy, you hypostatize DQ just as Plato hypostatized the Good, which makes you a dialectician, a Platonic metaphysician of the kind that Pirsig railed against in ZMM. I simply wanted to point this out to anybody who thought that Squonk was trying to evade my charge. Instead of evading it, Squonk took it head on and essentially said, "Yes, I am a metaphysician of the kind that Pirsig dislikes in ZMM."

    Matt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 10 2003 - 18:38:03 BST