MD mythos vs logos

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:49:22 BST

  • Next message: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com: "Re: MD myths and symbols"

     

    PIRSIG from chapter 30
    "Philosophers usually present their ideas as sprung from "nature" or
    sometimes from "God," but Phadreus thought neither of these was completely
    accurate. The logical order of things which the philosophers study is
    derived from the "mythos".The mythos is the social culture and the rhetoric
    which the culture must invent before philosophy becomes possible. Most of
    this religious talk is nonsense, of course, but nonsense or not, it is the
    PARENT of our modern scientific talk. This "mythos over logos" thesis agreed
    with the MOQ's assertion that intellectual static patterns of quality are
    built up out of social static quality. Digging back into ancient Greek
    history, to the time when this mythos-to logos transition was taking
    place...."

    sq: The mythos of social culture and rhetoric is intellectual. Culture and
    rhetoric here involve: 'The collection and manipulation of symbols, created
    in the brain, that stand for patterns of experience.' It may not be
    philosophy, but it is intellectual. From this comes philosophy, from
    philosophy comes scientific talk.

    [David Buchanan] In the Lila quote Pirsig is explaining the distinction
    between the mythos and the logos. He's saying that the logos is built up out
    of the mythos, that it is derived from the mythos and distinct from it.
    Squank seems to interpret this to mean that the mythos IS the logos, that
    the parent IS the child, that old religious rhetoric IS the same as our
    modern scientific talk. I'm truly baffled by this lapse of logic and wonder
    how anyone could subscribe to such nonsense. It erases one of the most
    important features of the MOQ and renders the moral codes utterly
    unintelligible. Like SOM, it fails to make a distinction between the social
    and intellectual level by simply asserting that they both happen in the
    brain, both involve some kind of cognitive function. This might be true, but
    it still does not negate the distinction.
     

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:49:21 BST