Re: MD string theory

From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Mon Nov 10 2003 - 20:09:56 GMT

  • Next message: johnny moral: "RE: MD Language in the MOQ"

    Hi

    I think less that our bodies are used to pick
    out certain patterns as meaningful then that
    they are used to filter out what would
    otherwise be overwhelming.

    regards
    David M
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Nathan Pila" <pila@sympatico.ca>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 9:40 PM
    Subject: Re: MD string theory

    > Hi David,
    >
    > Sound does not necessarily product hearing. Right? Consider a deaf person
    > whose eardrum does not vibrate to the beat of the sound. The sound is
    there
    > but he hears nothing.
    >
    > Also, hearing can be done without listening. I am sitting here and not
    > listening to the television in the other room yet I hear it.
    >
    > I guess the question I'm getting at is what you think of the fact that our
    > brains are wired so that some inputs are meaningful while others are not.
    >
    > Is it not an accident of incredible luck that evolution gave us an
    > instrument that is useful for asking questions and pondering the meaning
    of
    > life?
    >
    > Nathan
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "David MOREY" <us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk>
    > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 9:46 AM
    > Subject: Re: MD string theory
    >
    >
    > > Hi
    > >
    > > Sound means hearing, hearing means a listening being.
    > > You've got to separate what is all too human from what
    > > occurs outside of conscious experience. & then 'outside of conscious
    > > experience'
    > > what meaning can that have?
    > >
    > > regards
    > > David M
    > >
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From: "Nathan Pila" <pila@sympatico.ca>
    > > To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    > > Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 1:16 AM
    > > Subject: MD string theory
    > >
    > >
    > > > Gert-Jan Peeters,
    > > >
    > > > Hmm, So, if there is no one in the forest, then the tree makes no
    sound
    > as
    > > > it falls, right?
    > > >
    > > > Did you happen to catch the latest NOVA on PBS? It was about the book
    > > called
    > > > The Elegant Universe. The book discusses 'string theory'. String
    theory
    > > > postulates that all matter and all radiation (photons, heat etc) is
    > > composed
    > > > of vibrating strings of energy. That, these strings, are the ultimate
    > > > reality; the strings vibrate in 11 dimensions. Since we can't imagine
    11
    > > > dimensions, is it fair to say that only 4 dimensions exist and the
    > strings
    > > > are unreal?
    > > >
    > > > on the television And in
    > > > personal
    > > > > life has increased. Others have found the MoQ to be very usefull.
    So,
    > > the
    > > > > world didn't change, but our explination did. And the best
    explination
    > > > wich
    > > > > gives us the least doubts starts with the assumption that experience
    > is
    > > > > reality. And without that experience there would be no reality.
    > > > >
    > > > > Your question: "If humans and all other beings that have
    consciousness
    > > > were
    > > > > to disappear, would apples stop falling?" I don't know. But if you
    > would
    > > > say
    > > > > that apples would still be falling, your saying more than that. And
    it
    > > > takes
    > > > > you down again to where you'll end up with all the contradictions.
    To
    > > > avoid
    > > > > those contradictions people use the Moq and the MoQ would give
    another
    > > > > explanation: If consciousness has disappeared I can never be sure if
    > > > apples
    > > > > fall. It falls outside my experience, so it falls outside reality.
    > > > > Experience is reality. No experience = no reality. No apples, no
    > > gravity,
    > > > > no ground to fall on...
    > > > >
    > > > > But then again - it's a temporary state of mind until someone finds
    a
    > > > better
    > > > > explination ..
    > > > >
    > > > > Gegroet,
    > > > >
    > > > > > Mail Archives:
    > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > >
    > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 10 2003 - 20:23:25 GMT