Re: MD DQ and Degeneracy - Which is which?

From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:39:44 GMT

Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD SQ-SQ tension in Chinese cuisine."

Previous message: Khalil: "Re: MD MOQ and Islam"
Maybe in reply to: Charles Vanderford: "MD DQ and Degeneracy - Which is which?"
Next in thread: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT: "Re: MD DQ and Degeneracy - Which is which?"
Maybe reply: ljory@mts.net: "Re: Re: MD DQ and Degeneracy - Which is which?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 2/24/04 1:21:00 AM GMT Standard Time,
proskuneo@fastermail.com writes:

> I look forward to hearing some thoughts.
>
> Charles
>
>

Hello Charles,
The term degeneracy is a static imposition of value do you not think?
If i regard degeneracy then i do so in a relationship between 'my' static
patterns of value and those i find degenerate.

It may be that i cannot distinguish between degeneracy and Dynamic change? I
do not feel there is a way of telling until the change has become a coherent
SQ-SQ tension.

Perhaps we may discern a mark of progression here? New coherent relationships
may be preferred?
Mark

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD SQ-SQ tension in Chinese cuisine."
Previous message: Khalil: "Re: MD MOQ and Islam"
Maybe in reply to: Charles Vanderford: "MD DQ and Degeneracy - Which is which?"
Next in thread: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT: "Re: MD DQ and Degeneracy - Which is which?"
Maybe reply: ljory@mts.net: "Re: Re: MD DQ and Degeneracy - Which is which?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 24 2004 - 16:41:43 GMT