From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Sat May 01 2004 - 19:34:55 BST
Platt, DMB
> More importantly, DMB reflects my own
> frustration when he says to Steve, "You've been complaining about
> talking
> about people in terms of the levels of value for as long as I can
> remember, but this objection never made sense to me. Still doesn't."
>
> However, I've given up trying to persuade Steve that unless people are
> granted the dominant role in the social and intellectual levels, the
> MOQ
> falls apart. Maybe DMB will be more persuasive.
>
> Platt
>
I keep saying that there is nothing wrong with using the levels to help
understand people, so I am extremely frustrated to hear DMB say and
Platt agree with: "You've been complaining about talking about people
in terms of the levels of value for as long as I can remember, but this
objection never made sense to me. Still doesn't." I've lost interest
in trying to persuade either of you of my point that though the levels
are useful in understanding people, the levels themselves do not
primarily represent types of people but rather types of patterns of
value.
Steve
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 01 2004 - 19:37:04 BST