From: PhaedrusWolf@aol.com
Date: Sat Nov 20 2004 - 20:04:12 GMT
In a message dated 11/20/04 10:55:15 AM Eastern Standard Time,
elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk writes:
Lila lost out on pure DQ but gained the benefit of a static latch (Rigel)
which was - we are led to
believe - a step forward for her. I think there is something in the
Protestant inspired cultures
which idolises the Dynamic, and is neglectful of the need for SQ patterns in
which that DQ might
flourish. RMP has space for both of course.
Hi Sam,
I must agree with your thinking, but I still see it as a sellout. By
conforming to everyone else's realities, it would seem you limit your creative
talents in understanding, or becoming enlightened to DQ. I do however agree that
DQ can only be stacked upon SQ, and as DQ is discovered, it still does not
eliminate SQ unless it is in contrast to a static pattern that turns out to be
inadequate.
Are you saying that Lila would be better off not turning her back on SQ
until she fully understood it to the point it is no longer a force in her life
that she has to contend with? Do you really think they can keep them down on the
farm after they have seen Paris? :o)
How does the Protestant culture fit into this idolizing of the Dynamic?
As far as Dan Glover's book "Lila's Child," that is most definitely on my
reading list, but at the moment, I want to get the perspective of some who may
or may not agree; it helps to round out the psyche. Though I find RMP's work
extremely insightful, it may be that I miss something by being too impressed
by it. But, yes, "Lila's Child" will enter into there soon.
Thanks,
Chin
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 20 2004 - 20:06:58 GMT