MD Noam Chomsky

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Sun Aug 01 2004 - 19:42:08 BST

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "MD Mislead or lie? I."

    Hi all,

    I think the following exchange is interesting. As does most of his
    political writing, it shows NC's awareness of the anathematic
    relationship between militant tribalism and individual freedom, how
    the violent and expansive variations of nationalism are low-quality
    value patterns indeed. I also like the tactical advice to be aware
    of the sympathies of your audience before shooting off your mouth.
    To fail to do so could be a waste of energy, and even dangerous, as I
    myself have discovered.

    I know NC is trapped in SOM, but I think all of us are, to one degree
    or another. We all have to return to the market place. Still,
    something drives him to spend his life doing what he does. With his
    brain, he could have made a jillion in currency speculation or
    something. I think what drives him is... well, you know. Though
    he'd probably think we were talking about Dairy Queen or something.
    ;-)

    Question follows response.

    Best,
    msh

    Reply from NC,

    I'd be reluctant to give any advice.  There is no doubt
    that in the present climate there are risks, and that you
    will just have to feel your way along, finding circles in
    which you can act freely.

    It is also worthwhile, always, to pay attention to one's
    audience.  There would be little point in marching into a
    fundamentalist place of worship and announcing that
    divinities are invented by people with emotional problems. 
    In this country, there are some sectors that are extremely
    frightened.  That goes way back.  In the 1780s the colonies
    were afraid they were going to be invaded by Algeria.  A
    local friend just told me about how a neighbor had offered
    him a tour, and a key, to his "survival shelter," where he
    keeps a huge arsenal to protect himself from the UN forces
    preparing to invade and commit genocide against the
    American people.  This has been associated with all sorts
    of racist fanaticism.  In the 19th century there was a
    widespread cult about our Anglo-Saxon origins, the peak of
    humankind, being polluted by immigrants -- later the
    Chinese and Huns (anyone from Eastern Europe), now Mexicans
    and other degenerates.  These deep fears are often combined
    with jingoism, and are exploited by cynical politicians who
    emphasize their "strength" and "courage" as they launch
    their incomparable military might to slaughter defenseless
    enemies.  Lyndon Johnson was very much a "man of the
    people," and he was probably speaking from his heart as a
    true Texan, not cynically, when he lamented about how
    America would be prey to every yellow dwarf with a pocket
    knife without superior air power, and if might makes right,
    "they" will sweep over us and take all we have -- "they"
    being everyone outside our blessed land.  Or Ronald Reagan,
    when he whined about Nicaraguan hordes only two-days
    driving time from Harlingen Texas, though he was going to
    be brave, like Churchill facing Hitler, and would not allow
    them to conquer and destroy us.

    People like you can play a very important role, bringing
    perspectives that are rarely heard in a highly insulated
    culture.  But you have to have a sympathetic understanding
    of the people you are engaged with.

    Noam Chomsky
         

    QUESTION
    Hello Prof. Chomsky,

    I'm an international student in the United States. Its a
    good opportunity for me to be able to hear some useful
    voices like yourslef (and to be grateful i don't have money
    for cable television!).

    Since I heard your lecture the first time in chennai (and
    lost my screws somewhere since), I have tried to be more
    involved. My question is what kind of roles can foreigners
    like myself can play (interms of say generally educating
    people or exchanging views) without legal trouble....I once
    told a former guy in the military that the US is a
    terrorist state. I was reminded by white moral authorities
    how meddlesome asians like me shold dessist from engaging
    in "political discussions in mixed company". I wonder what
    it means to this day....It seems that "people would see me
    with prejudice as I'm from india". And it was okay as "the
    same situation would be true for a foreigner in india". I
    think hey, its a bad idea to compare india with the
    US,....US is the land of freedom and opportunity.

    Well, I didn't find it to be true that all americans see me
    with prejudice. Infact, one old lady was listening pretty
    patiently to what I had to say. There were others who
    disagreed but nevertheless didn't mind my babbles.

    But somehow, there is this "group" which feels that you
    know i should shut up because of "mixed company". I mean I
    can very well understand if there were objections raised if
    I participated in a rally or something. But I don't
    understand why people get upset over an Asian expressing
    his views in interpersonal exchanges. I guess its a risk
    worth taking?

    Best wishes,
    Karthik

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 19:43:26 BST