Re: MD Democracy in the MOQ

From: Steve Peterson (peterson.steve@verizon.net)
Date: Tue Nov 25 2003 - 21:13:49 GMT

  • Next message: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com: "Re: MD The Matt-Paul Debates"

    Hi Mati, Paul, all,

    > Paul:
    > This repression of "illegal intellectual patterns" is not limited to any
    > part of the world; I would think it is a matter of intensity rather than
    > a clear cut absence of an entire evolutionary level. The west has its
    > "illegal patterns" too.
    >
    > Mati: What "illegal patterns" are you referring to?

    Paul gave his answer to this question. I'd just like to add my first
    thoughts when reading Paul's suggestion that our western intellectual
    culture also maintains illegal intellectual patterns.

    (I think Paul's answer about insanity may be a different issue than that of
    Stalin and Saddam since on insanity we are talking about one set of
    intellectual patterns overruling another set rather than social tyranny over
    intellectual freedom.)

    I find that both American liberals and conservatives have their own brands
    of social tyranny over intellectual freedom. We can recognize illegal
    intellectual patterns by the topics of conversation that we can only have
    with trusted friends or in places where we feel comfortable accepting
    negative social consequences for our views. I know that I have said
    something illegal when disagreement comes not in the form of reasoned
    argument but rather in labeling me as some type of person (e.g. unpatriotic,
    racist, or in the MD as a social level type.) By MOQ premises it would be
    moral for one idea to outlaw another, but immoral for an idea to be outlawed
    on social grounds.

    On the conservative side I found that I could not talk about the roots of
    terrorism after the 9/11 attacks without being accused of being
    anti-American or supporting the terrorists. Such accusations by
    conservatives continue in the news with great frequency in reference to tax
    cuts and (obviously) the Patriot Act. Rather than argue a point,
    conservatives like to merely say that so-and-so "is biased" or "has an
    agenda."

    Liberals think that this sort of social tyranny is only perpetrated by
    (fascist) conservatives, and I do hold out the most hope for liberals to
    choose the right side in the social-intellectual conflict (and for this I am
    most irritated by their short-comings). Yet, liberals fuel the continuous
    social attack on intellect known as political correctness. Extreme liberals
    will even right-off the views of any white middle-class male who did agrees
    with the liberal positions on social engineering as hopelessly racist due to
    racist cultural indoctrination.

    In a recent example of liberals failing to take the intellectual route,
    liberals cheered when Limbaugh got canned for being a racist, favoring
    social level name-calling over intellectual argument about whether Rush was
    right or wrong about media hype. Personally, I found that among liberals I
    could not focus conversation on whether Rush had any point about the media
    without being considered to be defending what Rush said and being viewed as
    racist. I find racial discussions to be conversations that cannot be had in
    America. In general, because certain positions are outlawed as politically
    incorrect, liberals prevent us from having the conversations that may lead
    to solutions to the social problems that they care so much about. They
    often merely seek to replace one form of cultural oppression with another
    rather than rising above the social tyranny.

    The important positive note to all this is that though western culture also
    outlaws certain intellectual patterns, unlike in many countries, we are
    fairly safe from being persecuted by our governments for our illegal
    intellectual patterns. We merely face social consequences but not
    biological ones. This is because Democracy in the west does not just mean
    "majority rules" but also that the individual's rights must be protected
    against the majority.

    Thanks,
    Steve

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 25 2003 - 21:15:14 GMT