MD immoral irony?????

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Sat Jun 26 2004 - 22:15:49 BST

  • Next message: Horse: "Re: MD The Final Cut"

    Hi Dan and all,

    On 26 Jun 2004 at 1:22, Dan Glover wrote:
    >msh says:
    >And this brings us back to the question of scientific evidence in
    >favor of the idea that "race" is a valid and useful construct. The
    >OVERWHELMING evidence, as I believe I pointed out, is that the
    >concept involves a social distinction based on superficial
    >appearances. A distinction made for some pretty ugly reasons, and
    >none of them scientific.
    >
    >Therefore, I see no logical consistency, agreement with experience,
    >or economy of explanation in clinging to race-based explanations of
    >human intelligence and behavior. I can, however, envision social
    >reasons for such tenacity.

    Hi Mark

    I think you may be conflating biological and social patterns of
    value. The MOQ is divided into four levels plus Dynamic Quality. The
    inorganic and biological level patterns of value are objective. They
    can be seen and studied with scientific instruments. The social and
    intellectual level patterns of value are subjective. No instrument
    can detect the President. As you note, normally we think of racism as
    based on superficial and unfounded reasoning-- social patterns of
    value -- subjective, in other words. Yet there are differences
    between the races at the biological level as well as I noted in my
    reply to Gav.

    msh says:
    Well, it's certainly possible that I'm conflating biological and
    social patterns of value. So let me see if I can clarify my ideas,
    for my own sake.

    Let's work at the bio level and assume there are single human genes
    for, say, skin color, eye color, eye-shape, hair color, hair texture,
    nose structure, lip structure. Let's assume further that these
    single genes may have only one of two possible on-off settings: black-
    white, brown-green, round-oval, black-blonde, wiry-straight, broad-
    pert, full-thin.

    So we have a scientist, working at the bio level, who can "create"
    on his computer all sorts of different looking people, just by
    setting some genes on, some off.

    Now let's assume our scientist working at the bio level has had no
    social contact with other people till the day someone walks into his
    lab and says: "Please provide me with the genetic makeup of an
    African-American." I suggest the scientist would have no way to do
    this, and would not even know what is meant. When he looks puzzled,
    his visitor might say, "Well, ok, how about an Asian? A Native-
    American? An Aborigine?" The scientist's continued bewilderment
    would annoy his visitor to the point where the visitor says "Look"
    then sits at the computer and flips the settings for our seven genes
    to ON then says, "See, this is an African-American." The visitor
    then goes on flipping switches, saying "And here's an Asian; and
    this is an Aborigine; and here's a Native-American; and this is a
    Northern-European."

    From that point on, the scientist can make racial distinctions, when
    asked for them, but in doing so he is making SVP distinctions, not
    BVP distinctions.

    Now let's get really whacky and say that there are single genes for
    intelligence, violence, promiscuity and criminality, and that all of
    these can be set to low-high. What a "scientist" like Rushton is
    saying is that, within our SVP racial distinctions, "Northern
    Europeans have these genes set to high-low-low-low in comparison to
    African-Americans who have them set to low-high-high-high.

    Anyway, Dan, thanks for your comments. As always, I'd be interested
    to hear any more thoughts on what I've tried to say here.

    Best,
    Mark

    -- 
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
    "Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is
    everything."  -- Henri Poincare'
    MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward  - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 26 2004 - 22:16:17 BST